C3.ai vs. UiPath: Investment Prospects Amid AI Boom

Investors are evaluating C3.ai and UiPath's potential as AI transformation leaders. C3.ai shows rapid growth but struggles with profitability, while UiPath's stable model and cash flow protection offer a balanced investment profile. Divergent paths spark debate as uncertainty looms.

Date: 14-05-2025

AI Rating: 6

Earnings Per Share (EPS)
In their comparison, there is mention of C3.ai's EPS estimates which suggest a slight improvement (4.3%) for 2025, while UiPath's predictions indicate a decline of 1.9%. This indicates that, even though C3.ai is not currently profitable, it is expected to improve slightly. Conversely, UiPath's decline in EPS highlights challenges in their growth trajectory.
Revenue Growth
C3.ai has reported total revenues of $98.8 million, representing a 26% increase year over year. This growth, however, is a deceleration from the previous quarter (29%), suggesting potential challenges in sustaining momentum. UiPath, with revenues of $1.43 billion growing modestly at 9%, shows that while larger, it faces similar slowdown pressures. The variances in revenue growth rates highlight differing strengths in their business models.
Net Income and Free Cash Flow (FCF)
C3.ai reported a GAAP net loss of 62 cents per share in its fiscal third quarter. On the other hand, UiPath revealed a GAAP operating profit of $34 million in its fiscal fourth quarter, signaling profitability potential. Furthermore, UiPath generated a robust free cash flow of $328 million, indicating a healthy cash-generative model despite its modest growth rate. C3.ai’s continued losses raise the concern of dilution risk and spending pressure, which could deter investors seeking stability.
Return on Equity (ROE)
While specific ROE figures were not provided in the report, the discussions surrounding profitability and cash flow suggest that UiPath may exhibit a superior financial health profile. Moving forward, a shift in investor sentiment could place a premium on stable cash flow generation, especially as macroeconomic uncertainties persist.
UiPath's stronger fiscal management and profitability contrasts with C3.ai's accelerating growth and higher risk profile. Given current market dynamics, investors focusing on stability may favor UiPath over C3.ai despite its slower growth.
Overall, the contrasting trajectories of these two companies in the booming AI automation sector highlight critical investment considerations, especially as potential economic pressures loom.

Stocks: AI PATH MSFT GOOGL AMZN XOM